Discussion:
[Twisted-Python] failing coverage builders
Judy Craig
2015-08-06 18:32:35 UTC
Permalink
This is an automatic reply. I am away from the office for the summer, returning on Tuesday, August 25, 2015. I will be happy to get back to you then.

Enjoy your summer!

Judy Craig
Student Services

This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are not
the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this email.
Glyph
2015-08-06 18:32:02 UTC
Permalink
The python 3.4 coverage builders are failing, apparently because one of the builders is down:

<https://buildbot.twistedmatrix.com/builders/debian7-py3.4-coverage/builds/399/steps/shell_5/logs/stdio <https://buildbot.twistedmatrix.com/builders/debian7-py3.4-coverage/builds/399/steps/shell_5/logs/stdio>>

I'll probably make those builders unsupported later today if there is no obvious fix; at this point, depending on codecov is mostly just a net negative. We can't have it reasonably fail our builds or report status for us, and "coverage html" produces perfectly usable coverage reports, and so the main consequence is that our builds will fail if they're down (or if they introduce a version of coverage on PyPI that doesn't support python 3, apparently?)

-glyph
Amber "Hawkie" Brown
2015-08-06 23:32:55 UTC
Permalink
Hi Glyph,

I'll take a look.

I find the combined codecov rather valuable for figuring out what isn't covered on either, but I'll remove it for now.

Amber "Hawkie" Brown
GPG: https://keybase.io/hawkowl
Post by Glyph
<https://buildbot.twistedmatrix.com/builders/debian7-py3.4-coverage/builds/399/steps/shell_5/logs/stdio>
I'll probably make those builders unsupported later today if there is no obvious fix; at this point, depending on codecov is mostly just a net negative. We can't have it reasonably fail our builds or report status for us, and "coverage html" produces perfectly usable coverage reports, and so the main consequence is that our builds will fail if they're down (or if they introduce a version of coverage on PyPI that doesn't support python 3, apparently?)
-glyph
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
Glyph
2015-08-07 04:11:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Amber "Hawkie" Brown
Hi Glyph,
I'll take a look.
I find the combined codecov rather valuable for figuring out what isn't covered on either, but I'll remove it for now.
I already removed it earlier, so that should be easy :-).

Raw coverage can do combining, if we can just ship the files somewhere:

http://nedbatchelder.com/code/coverage/cmd.html#cmd-combining <http://nedbatchelder.com/code/coverage/cmd.html#cmd-combining>

But, perhaps we should just not fail the build if codecov submission fails.

-glyph

Loading...