Tristan Seligmann
2016-02-01 03:52:01 UTC
Working on tickets such as #8180[1] and #8187[2] suggests that it would be
useful to have a builder running on Debian unstable (and/or other "bleeding
edge" distributions, most of them have something similar) in order to pick
up problematic changes like this sooner. #8180 is just a case of a newer
upstream release (OpenSSH 7.0 disables DSA key support by default), whereas
I think #8187 is a "distro policy" type thing (OpenSSL in Debian unstable
is compiled without SSLv3_METHOD support).
I don't think making such a builder be a supported platform would be
feasible (at least as things currently stand), but at least it would serve
as a canary for this sort of issue.
Thoughts?
useful to have a builder running on Debian unstable (and/or other "bleeding
edge" distributions, most of them have something similar) in order to pick
up problematic changes like this sooner. #8180 is just a case of a newer
upstream release (OpenSSH 7.0 disables DSA key support by default), whereas
I think #8187 is a "distro policy" type thing (OpenSSL in Debian unstable
is compiled without SSLv3_METHOD support).
I don't think making such a builder be a supported platform would be
feasible (at least as things currently stand), but at least it would serve
as a canary for this sort of issue.
Thoughts?